Supreme Court won’t take up challenge to Jack Smith’s Trump Twitter data access
- The Supreme Court declined to hear X Corp.'s appeal, stating special counsel Jack Smith's search warrant for Donald Trump's Twitter messages did not violate the First Amendment.
- X claimed the nondisclosure order was an "unprecedented end-run around executive privilege," potentially impacting other privileged communications.
- A trial court and appeals panel agreed disclosing the warrant could harm the grand jury investigation, allowing access to Trump’s direct messages.
51 Articles
51 Articles
Supreme Court Declines Request From Elon Musk’s X To Review Jack Smith’s Trump Account Warrant.
The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a challenge to a search warrant special counsel Jack Smith obtained for former President Donald Trump’s X account. A judge approved Smith’s request in January 2023 for a warrant that provided access to information like Trump’s draft tweets, search history and direct… Supreme Court Declines Request From Elon Musk’s X To Review Jack Smith’s Trump Account Warrant.
ThePatriotLight - Supreme Court Rejects Musk's Case Against Jack Smith Over Trump's Twitter Records
ThePatriotLight - Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge filed by Elon Musk’s X platform to rulings that forced it to turn over data on former President Donald Trump’s X account to special counsel Jack Smith.In 2023, Smith obtained a warrant for Trump’s Twitter account as part of federal prosecutors’ 2020 election case against the former president. Trump had frequently used the accoun…
Jack Smith: Supreme Court Sides Against Twitter X Regarding Secret Search Warrant
The Supreme Court just shut down X’s challenge to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s warrant for President Donald Trump’s @RealDonaldTrump account. Jack Smith, who admitted to a little “oops” moment in his warrant request, managed to keep things hush-hush. Meanwhile, X was slapped with a $350K fine for not being quick about handing over records. Seems a bit excessive. The Justice Department’s excuse is that they didn’t want President Trump knowing abo…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium