Supreme Court revives lawsuit from Atlanta family whose home was wrongly raided by the FBI
FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, JUN 12 – The Supreme Court unanimously ruled the family can sue the FBI for damages after a 2017 wrong-house raid caused trauma and property damage under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
- The Supreme Court decided unanimously on Thursday that the Atlanta family mistakenly targeted in a 2017 FBI raid can proceed with their lawsuit and receive another opportunity for legal recourse.
- The family's 2019 lawsuit followed a predawn FBI SWAT raid that wrongly entered their home due to a GPS error, with the 11th Circuit previously blocking the case under the Supremacy Clause.
- During the raid, agents forced entry through the front entrance, used a flashbang grenade, aimed their firearms at Trina Martin and Toi Cliatt, and caused distress to their 7-year-old son before discovering they had targeted the wrong residence.
- Representatives for the family brought their case before the Supreme Court, referencing Congress's 1974 provisions that permit such legal actions, while advocacy groups from various political backgrounds cautioned that reversing the ruling would restrict opportunities to hold federal law enforcement accountable.
- The Supreme Court's decision revives the family's lawsuit, reversing lower court dismissals and reopening debates on federal immunity and law enforcement oversight.
160 Articles
160 Articles
Supreme Court Revives Lawsuit Over FBI SWAT Raid on Innocent Family
In a rare unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has revived a lawsuit filed by Atlanta residents Curtrina Martin and Hilliard Cliatt, whose home was mistakenly raided by FBI SWAT agents in 2017. The family had their lawsuit dismissed by lower courts, but now the justices have sent the case back to the 11th Circuit to reconsider key legal questions under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). Supreme Court Revives Lawsuit Over FBI SWAT Raid on …
'Cross-examination can't be denied'
The Supreme Court has ruled that denying the opportunity of cross-examination to a witness constitutes a violation of Article 10-A of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to a fair trial. A five-page judgment authored by Justice Salahuddin Panwar, while setting aside the order of the Federal Service Tribunal, noted that the cross-examination was the highest and most indispensable test known to the law for the discovery of truth. The top …


In NCLA Amicus Win, Supreme Court Revives Innocent Family’s Suit over FBI’s Wrong-House Raid
Washington, DC, June 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ dismissal of Martin v. United States, an Atlanta family’s Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit against the government for…
SCOTUS Rules Atlanta Family Can Sue Gov’t in Wrongful Raid Case
The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously ruled in favor of a family whose Atlanta home was wrongfully raided in the middle of the night by FBI agents eight years ago, allowing their damages lawsuit against the federal government to move forward. In 2017, Curtrina Martin, her partner and her then-7-year-old son were abruptly awoken when a six-agent SWAT team smashed their front door with a battering ram, detonated a flashbang grenade and raided …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 60% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium