US EditionSupreme Court Lifts Restrictions on Los Angeles Immigration Stops Based on Race or Language
The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision lifts restrictions on immigration enforcement allowing stops based on broad factors, affecting millions in the Los Angeles area, with strong dissents from liberal justices.
- The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to block a federal judge's order limiting immigration stops in Los Angeles, allowing federal agents to proceed with such operations based on race or language.
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh stated that 'the balance of harms and equities in this case tips in favor of the Government,' supporting the administration's immigration approach.
- Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass criticized the raids, stating they are 'creating a sense of fear and terror' in her city.
- Justice Sotomayor called the ruling 'troubling,' noting it subjects many to indignities based on their appearance or language.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
69 Articles
69 Articles
'Carte blanche to go after anyone': Immigrants fearful after Supreme Court green lights raids
Monday’s Supreme Court order gives the go-ahead on what critics called “indiscriminate” immigration stops that led to thousands of arrests and set off days of protests in the Los Angeles area.
·Los Angeles, United States
Read Full Article
Supreme Court blesses racial profiling because of course
The now familiar 6-3 lineup at the United States Supreme Court just threw out decades of settled law so that President Donald Trump’s roving bands of masked federal agents in Los Angeles can engage in a little light racial profiling, as a treat, and can continue scooping up people based on nothing more than looking Latino, speaking Spanish, and working at a low-wage job like a car wash. You know the drill. A lower-court judge wrote a detailed, …
·United States
Read Full Article
Coverage Details
Total News Sources69
Leaning Left30Leaning Right18Center10Last UpdatedBias Distribution52% Left
Bias Distribution
- 52% of the sources lean Left
52% Left
L 52%
C 17%
R 31%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
