US EditionSupreme Court justices appear skeptical that Trump tariffs are legal
- On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. heard nearly three hours of oral arguments about President Donald Trump’s `Liberation Day` tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act .
- Several American businesses and Democratic‑leaning states filed consolidated challenges after lower courts, including the United States Court of International Trade and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, ruled against the administration.
- Conservative justices pressed United States Solicitor General D. John Sauer on how IEEPA authorizes tariffs, while Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh questioned the government’s rationale and presidential authority limits on Wednesday.
- SCOTUSblog's Zachary Shemtob said a majority may rule against Trump and issue a decision before Christmas, while lawyers warned refunds could be `a mess` and justices noted $195 billion in federal government customs duties for fiscal 2025.
- Legal scholars note the dispute invokes separation‑of‑powers issues, including the nondelegation and major questions doctrines, while critics warn using IEEPA for tariffs could expand executive branch power.
421 Articles
421 Articles
Will Supreme Court's 'Originalist' Justices Permit Trump's Power Grab?
I think the Supreme Court will rule against President Donald Trump's imposition of tariffs. That said, it's just remarkable that the vote will not be 9-0.Trump is claiming sweeping powers to impose (and rescind and reimpose and re-rescind) tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Ac...
Trump's Tariffs Seem To Be 'Dead On Arrival At SCOTUS'
Ed. note: Welcome to our daily feature, Quote of the Day. The hearing was a bloodbath for the Trump administration: Six justices lined up to bash the Justice Department’s defense of the tariffs, barely disguising their annoyance with the government’s barrage of blustery nonsense. At the halfway point, it would’ve saved everyone time had the court just huddled, announced its decision from the bench, and recessed early for lunch. — Mark Joseph Ste…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
