Social media ban for under-16s backed by Lords
Peers voted 261 to 150 in favor of an amendment proposing a social media ban for under-16s to address screen time and online safety concerns, with 74% public support.
- On Wednesday the House of Lords backed an amendment to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill banning under-16s from social media, passing 261 to 150; MPs in the House of Commons will now consider it.
- A YouGov poll in December found 74% support, while campaigners, parents and actor Hugh Grant backed a petition with more than 68,000 signatures for the social media ban.
- Requiring `highly effective` age checks within 12 months, the amendment targets social media platforms, online games, messaging services and restricts children's access to VPN services.
- Earlier this week the government launched a three-month consultation and will report in the summer, though Downing Street previously said it would not accept the amendment.
- `We already know these systems are risky,' James Baker of the Open Rights Group said, warning that mass age verification risks serious privacy and data harms, citing last year's Discord breach.
50 Articles
50 Articles
Britain could be the pioneer of a social media ban on children in Europe. Parliament has waved through the ban.
Australia has already put into effect a ban, at least it is being discussed in Germany. It is also a controversial issue in the UK.
The vote on the amendment to the Child Welfare and Schools Bill led by the opposition tory, which contemplates this restriction, has been...
British politics is committed to child welfare and wants to introduce another law to this effect, which would drastically restrict social media channels for young people and children.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 41% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

























