Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Supreme Court Junks Plea Against MHA Circular on Vande Mataram, Terms It 'Vague Apprehension of Discrimination'

The Supreme Court ruled the MHA advisory on Vande Mataram is not mandatory and involves no penalties, calling the petition premature and based on vague discrimination fears.

  • On Wednesday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain a plea against the Union Ministry of Home Affairs circular on Vande Mataram, ruling the directive is not mandatory at official events.
  • The Home Ministry previously released guidelines requiring all six stanzas of Vande Mataram be presented first when both the National Song and National Anthem are performed at official events.
  • A Bench including Chief Justice Surya Kant termed the plea "premature" and based on "vague apprehension of discrimination." Justice Bagchi noted Clause 5 uses 'may,' making singing voluntary.
  • Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, representing petitioner Muhammed Sayeed Noori, argued people may feel compelled to participate in a "social demonstration of loyalty," creating a "huge burden" for dissenters.
  • Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind President Maulana Arshad Madani criticized the directive as a "blatant attack on freedom of religion," while the All India Muslim Personal Law Board called it unconstitutional.
Insights by Ground AI

18 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 56% of the sources lean Left
56% Left

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

livelaw.in broke the news in India on Wednesday, March 25, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal