US EditionReviving PASPA? DC suit tests the limits of Murphy and the Home Rule
Summary by egr.global
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
Reviving PASPA? DC suit tests the limits of Murphy and the Home Rule
The 2018 Supreme Court decision in Murphy v NCAA struck down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), fundamentally reshaping the US sports betting landscape. By declaring PASPA unconstitutional, the court allowed states – and potentially federal jurisdictions like Washington, DC – to authorize and regulate sports betting. Since Murphy, more than 30 states and the district have enacted some form of legalized sports wagering, i…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
