Republican governors pursue new congressional maps after US Supreme Court ruling
The session would set up special primaries if courts allow Alabama to restore its 2023 congressional map and 2021 state Senate map.
- Alabama Governor Kay Ivey called a special legislative session starting May 4 to redraw the state's House maps following a Supreme Court ruling against race-based districts.
- The session aims to prepare for potential court actions affecting district maps and may establish procedures for special primary elections.
- Republican leaders expressed confidence that Alabama will defend its right to determine district boundaries and that the legislative map will prevail in court.
- The redistricting follows the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais decision, which narrowed Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and affected similar efforts in other southern states.
32 Articles
32 Articles
Tennessee and Alabama take steps to redraw House maps in wake of Supreme Court ruling
The Republican governors of Tennessee and Alabama called state lawmakers into special sessions on Friday, initial steps in what could be a scramble to redraw congressional maps after the Supreme Court narrowed the Voting Rights Act.
Republican Governor Calls Special Session Amid "Pending Redistricting Litigation"
Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey has called state lawmakers into a special session to consider a new congressional map following the Supreme Court’s ruling to strike down a provision of the Voting Rights Act that required majority-minority House districts. “Regarding our own pending redistricting litigation, I remain hopeful Alabama will receive a favorable outcome from the U.S. Supreme Court, which is why I am now calling a special session of the Alabama …
Alabama becomes second state to move to redraw maps after Supreme Court ruling
Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey on Friday announced the Republican-controlled state legislature will hold a special session next week to pave the way for redistricting – becoming the second state to take action following the Supreme Court’s decision further weakening the Voting Rights Act.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 55% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium



















