US EditionPossible Isn't A Compelling Argument - Dale Peterson: ICS Security Catalyst
Summary by Dale Peterson: ICS Security Catalyst
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
Possible Isn't A Compelling Argument - Dale Peterson: ICS Security Catalyst
In a recent LinkedIn post Andrew Ginter made the case that legal liability is an argument for investing in cybersecurity. That those responsible for managing risk, and cybersecurity in particular, should put in place “reasonable” security controls to reduce legal liability if a cyber incident causes a loss of life, or damages to commercial or societal interests. After some back and forth in the comments, Andrew wrote: No, to my knowledge, there…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
