US EditionCJEU Raises Bar for Safe Country Designation in Landmark Asylum Ruling
7 Articles
7 Articles
ECJ Ruling “Castrates” Member States’ Migration Policy
The recent ruling of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), restricting member states’ unilateral ‘safe country of origin’ designation and hindering deportations, represents a serious overreach that “castrates” EU members’ migration policies, warned a German constitutional law expert, Prof. Markus C. Kerber, in a recent interview with Exxpress. As we wrote on Friday, the ECJ ruled that member states may only designate countries of origin as ‘safe’…
Are deportations now becoming more difficult? On the contrary, the most important answers to the European Court of Justice's ruling on safe countries of origin at a glance.
According to the ECJ ruling that EU members are not allowed to arbitrarily determine which countries of origin are safe, Italy's government makes mood against the judiciary, which hinders its illegal asylum policy.
CJEU raises bar for safe country designation in landmark asylum ruling
The European Court of Justice (CJEU) has issued a landmark ruling Friday that tightens legal requirements for EU member states wishing to designate “safe countries of origin” for accelerated asylum processing. In its decision on Friday, the CJEU upheld the legality of expedited asylum procedures in principle but made clear that such classifications must be based on rigorous, transparent evidence and subject to meaningful judicial review. The rul…
The latest ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union has caused a major uproar in European migration policy. According to the ruling, which regulates asylum policy, a third country can only be classified as a “safe country of origin” if all social groups – such as women, religious or sexual minorities – are adequately protected there. Without this, asylum applications from there cannot be rejected in an accelerated procedure.
Bunch From Luxembourg: Eu Court of Justice Bans the Extension of Safe Countries of Origin Until 2026
It is a highly political judgment. And once again, one that seems to float freely in the air, as if there were no corresponding reality about it and not different goods that would weigh it up. In the sentence it says apodictically: "A Member State must not include a State in the list of safe states of origin, if this State does not provide sufficient protection for its entire population." That is the central sentence. And "its entire population"…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 75% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
