The Same Union Supporting a Billionaire Tax Wants Voters to Limit Clinic Spending. Here’s What to Know About Prop. 44
Clinics and advocates say the measure could cut patient services and trigger $1.7 billion in penalties in the first year, according to a commissioned study.
- Proposition 44, backed by the 120,000-member Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, would mandate clinics spend 90% of revenue on patient care and limit administrative expenses to 10%.
- SEIU-UHW proponents claim clinics misappropriate funds for executive salaries rather than patient services, while clinics counter they already reinvest 100% of revenue and administrative costs are operationally essential.
- A study commissioned by the California Primary Care Association projects most clinics could close if penalties totaling $1.7 billion are enforced, threatening rural support services like transportation and medical records.
- The California Primary Care Association filed a September lawsuit alleging the union unlawfully offered to kill the measure in exchange for membership gains; union spokesperson Renee Saldana called the allegations 'categorically false.'
- Voters will decide the initiative's fate following a legislative attempt last year that failed in committee, with opponents raising about $37.6 million to defeat the measure.
12 Articles
12 Articles
The same union supporting a billionaire tax wants voters to limit clinic spending. Here’s what to know about Prop. 44
Prop. 44 would require clinics to spend more money on patient care. The same union backing the billionaire tax supports it.
OP-ED: Proposition 44 Would Put a Price on Trust
Oakland’s public conversation about health care must begin with a simple truth: a doctor’s appointment is not the same thing as access to care. For a mother juggling work and child care, access may mean a text-message reminder, a bus pass, an evening appointment, or someone who can explain what Medi-Cal covers. For an older patient managing diabetes, it may mean help scheduling a specialist visit and understanding new medications. For a family t…
OP-ED: Proposition 44 Would Put a Price on Trust – The Windy City Word
Oakland’s public conversation about health care must begin with a simple truth: a doctor’s appointment is not the same thing as access to care. For a mother juggling work and child care, access may mean a text-message reminder, a bus pass, an evening appointment, or someone who can explain what Medi-Cal covers. For an older patient managing diabetes, it may mean help scheduling a specialist visit and understanding new medications. For a family t…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 75% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium











