US EditionSupreme Court Prevents Retired Firefighter From Suing Former Employer Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
- On June 20, the Supreme Court decided that Karyn Stanley, a retired firefighter, does not have the legal right to pursue a disability discrimination claim against her former employer in Sanford, Florida, regarding the reduction of her post-retirement health insurance benefits.
- The case arose after Stanley retired in 2018 due to Parkinson’s disease and lost a city health insurance subsidy that was limited to two years for disabled retirees under a 2003 policy change.
- The Court’s majority, led by Justice Gorsuch, held that the ADA’s protections apply only to current employees or job seekers, not former employees like Stanley, upholding lower court rulings that dismissed her claims.
- Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, emphasizing that the ADA does not limit its protections based on whether the alleged disability discrimination occurred before or after employment, asserting that the law offers no distinction regarding the timing of discriminatory actions.
- The ruling sets a precedent limiting ADA claims by retirees but leaves open the possibility for Congress to amend the law to cover such situations, while raising implications for disabled retirees’ protections nationwide.
42 Articles
42 Articles
Retired Florida firefighter with Parkinson’s loses disabilities fight at US Supreme Court
TALLAHASSEE — The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ruled against a firefighter who retired early because of Parkinson’s disease and alleged the city of Sanford violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by limiting a health-insurance subsidy. Justices upheld a decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the lawsuit filed by Karyn Stanley, a fire-department lieutenant who retired in 2018 at age 47 because of the effects of the disease. Th…
Retired Sanford firefighter with Parkinson’s loses disabilities fight at US Supreme Court
TALLAHASSEE — The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ruled against a firefighter who retired early because of Parkinson’s disease and alleged the city of Sanford violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by limiting a health-insurance subsidy. Justices upheld a decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the lawsuit filed by Karyn Stanley, a fire-department lieutenant who retired in 2018 at age 47 because of the effects of the disease. Th…
Supreme Court Ruling Limits Disability Discrimination Lawsuits for Retirees
Supreme Court Ruling Limits Disability Discrimination Lawsuits for Retirees The U.S. Supreme Court has delivered a critical ruling that prevents retirees from initiating lawsuits against former employers over disability discrimination connected to retirement benefits. This decision emerged from the case of Karyn Stanley, a former firefighter from Florida. She alleged that her employer discriminated against her by discontinuing a health insurance…
Supreme Court curbs discrimination claims over lost retiree benefits
Retirees cannot sue their former employers for disability discrimination after leaving their jobs, the Supreme Court decided on Friday in a ruling against a disabled former Florida firefighter that could make it harder to bring lawsuits seeking to restore lost…
Supreme Court prevents retired firefighter from suing former employer under the Americans with Disabilities Act
The Supreme Court on Friday shut down efforts by a retired Florida firefighter to sue her former employer under the Americans with Disabilities Act. By a vote of 8-1, the justices ruled that Karyn Stanley, who was forced to retire in 2018 because of Parkinson’s disease, cannot challenge the termination of her health insurance after she retired. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the lone dissenter, writing that the court’s decision “renders meani…
Neil Gorsuch Starts Some Supreme Court Drama. Ketanji Brown Jackson Ends It. - Above the Law
Today, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida. The majority decision, penned by Neil Gorsuch, limited the application of the Americans with Disabilities Act, saying an ex-firefighter did not have the right to sue her former employer over benefits. But more than just further eroding discrimination law in this country, the decision also gave us a peek into the petty back-and-forth of the High Court. We kn…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 42% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
