Skip to main content
Holiday Sale — Get 40% off Vantage for yourself or as a gift
Published loading...Updated

No relief for Udayanidhi in the ancient dispute, what did the Supreme Court say on the demand to file an FIR.

Summary by आज तक
Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Deepankar Dutta's bench asked senior attorney Abhishek Manu Singhvi, represented on Stalin' s behalf, that his case could not be compared to that of media workers. The court said, "You have spoken, we don 't know if it' s in the public domain or not, but now that the summons has been issued, you cannot come here by filing 32."

1 Articles

Lean Right

Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Deepankar Dutta's bench asked senior attorney Abhishek Manu Singhvi, represented on Stalin' s behalf, that his case could not be compared to that of media workers. The court said, "You have spoken, we don 't know if it' s in the public domain or not, but now that the summons has been issued, you cannot come here by filing 32."

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 100% of the sources lean Right
100% Right

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

आज तक broke the news in on Tuesday, April 2, 2024.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)
News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal