See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

No relief for Udayanidhi in the ancient dispute, what did the Supreme Court say on the demand to file an FIR.

Summary by आज तक
Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Deepankar Dutta's bench asked senior attorney Abhishek Manu Singhvi, represented on Stalin' s behalf, that his case could not be compared to that of media workers. The court said, "You have spoken, we don 't know if it' s in the public domain or not, but now that the summons has been issued, you cannot come here by filing 32."
DisclaimerThis story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.

1 Articles

All
Left
Center
Right
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

आज तक broke the news in on Tuesday, April 2, 2024.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join us as a member to unlock exclusive access to diverse content.