No radiation spike or impact at Iran's nuclear sites, says IAEA after Israeli strikes
- On Friday, Israel launched large-scale strikes called 'Operation Rising Lion' targeting Iran's Natanz nuclear and military facilities, escalating regional tensions.
- The strikes followed IAEA accusations that Iran failed to meet non-proliferation obligations amid concerns about Iran enriching uranium toward weapon-grade levels.
- While Israel claims significant damage to Natanz and Iran reports damage limited to above-ground structures, the IAEA confirmed no nuclear reactors or core sites were hit and detected no radiation increase.
- IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi described the attack as deeply concerning and highlighted ongoing close monitoring, while Russia's UN representative noted threats to IAEA personnel and urged objective assessment including radiological consequences.
- The event signals a sharp intensification in the Israel-Iran conflict with serious implications for regional security and non-proliferation, though no radiological hazards have been reported so far.
46 Articles
46 Articles
The International Atomic Energy Agency has admitted that recent Israeli bombings against Iranian nuclear installations have not caused injury.
The United Nations atomic monitoring agency reported that there is no indication of increased levels of radiation at Iran's main uranium enrichment site, an initial signal that Israel's attacks have not penetrated the containment layers protecting the Islamic Republic's nuclear stock.The Iranian authorities informed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that they have not observed higher doses of radiation at the Natanz facility, located…
Key Iran Nuclear Enrichment Site of Natanz Shows No Sign of Breach
The United Nations atomic watchdog said there’s no indication of increased radiation levels at Iran’s main uranium-enrichment site, an early sign that Israel’s strikes haven’t penetrated the containment layers protecting the Islamic Republic’s nuclear stockpile.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 44% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium