Meta lures Apple AI expert with $200m pay offer
SAN FRANCISCO, JUL 9 – Meta's new superintelligence team includes over 10 former OpenAI researchers and offers compensation rivaling CEO pay at major banks, with over $200 million packages tied to performance.
- Meta Platforms Inc. offered over $200 million to recruit Apple AI expert Ruoming Pang into its superintelligence team, highlighting aggressive talent acquisition efforts.
- Meta's recent AI delays, employee exits, and fierce competition with OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic prompted increased recruitment efforts under Zuckerberg's goal to lead in superintelligence development.
- Meta's superintelligence lab offers a package including a base salary, large signing bonuses, and Meta stock with performance-based vesting conditions, most of which depend on long-term loyalty and stock performance.
- Meta's aggressive recruitment strategy has successfully attracted over 10 AI researchers from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, impacting the talent landscape in AI development.
- Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman are set to meet at Sun Valley’s Allen & Co. conference, highlighting discussions on AGI development and shaping AI’s future.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
32 Articles
32 Articles
All
Left
4
Center
4
Right
4
SURVEY - Mark Zuckerberg's big project announced in 2021 is now ridiculing. Yet, between smart glasses, digital twins and IA, the hybridization between real and virtual advances at low noise.
·Paris, France
Read Full ArticleMeta Is Reportedly Paying an Apple Engineer Over $200 Million to Join Its Superintelligence Effort
Meta is reportedly offering a former Apple manager more than $200 million across several years to help advance its superintelligence effort. Read more about Meta, here.
·San Francisco, United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources32
Leaning Left4Leaning Right4Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution33% Left, 33% Center, 33% Right
Bias Distribution
- 33% of the sources lean Left, 33% of the sources are Center, 33% of the sources lean Right
33% Right
L 33%
C 33%
R 33%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium