US EditionJK Rowling Reacts to UK Supreme Court's Trans Women Ruling
- The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled that transgender women are not legally women according to the 2010 Equality Act, as stated by Justice Patrick Hodge.
- J.K. Rowling celebrated the UK Supreme Court ruling that transgender women are not legally women, saying she is 'so proud' of the decision and the group For Women Scotland.
- Rowling claimed the ruling protects the rights of women and girls, stating, 'The court clarified that UK women have sex-based rights.'
- Some criticized the ruling as harmful to transgender communities, with singer Mae Muller condemning Rowling's stance, saying, 'your transphobia has made you incredibly incredibly ugly inside and out.
58 Articles
58 Articles
The West Australian
PerthNowHarry Potter author in transgender storm after court ruling
World-renowned author JK Rowling has wasted no time jumping back into the transgender debate limelight and branded a famous UK newsreader a ‘man’ after a controversial court ruling.
J.K. Rowling welcomes online UK Supreme Court ruling on trans women
“I love it when a plan is successfully implemented,” British writer J. K. Rowling said in her X account the unanimous ruling of the UK Supreme Court that states that British law defines a woman as a biologically born female. “The concept of sex is binary, a person is female or a man,” the court ruled. Transgender women – even though they have a gender recognition certificate (CRG) – do not comply with the definition of women in British equality …
Transitioning teen cannot change name, Mississippi Supreme Court rules
The Mississippi Supreme Court has ruled that that a teen undergoing gender transition cannot change his name. The court's justices voted 8-1 to affirm a decision by a Hinds County Chancery judge denying the teen's name-change request. Both of the…
J.K. Rowling has seriously lost the plot
It’s no surprise that notorious anti-trans activist J.K. Rowling is celebrating a major UK Supreme Court ruling against trans rights, but the way she’s going about it truly underscores how out of her depth she is with this entire gender crusade she’s been on in recent years.On Wednesday, the court declared that the legal definition of "sex" in the 2010 Equality Act refers strictly to biological sex, not gender identity — even legally recognized …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 48% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
