See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Jeremy Renner Addresses His Ex-Wife’s Allegation that He Threatened to Kill Her

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JUL 13 – Jeremy Renner denies 2019 custody allegations made by ex-wife Sonni Pacheco and describes them as "clickbait" while emphasizing their current amicable co-parenting arrangement.

  • Jeremy Renner addressed allegations made by his ex-wife Sonni Pacheco in their 2019 divorce proceedings, concerning threats and custody issues.
  • The allegations originated during custody battles over their daughter Ava, who was six years old at the time, with Pacheco seeking sole custody.
  • Renner denied all claims, described Pacheco's allegations as one-sided, and emphasized he and Pacheco now maintain an amicable relationship while sharing custody.
  • Renner, a high-income actor earning $11.4 million in 2018, has paid substantial child support, including $13,000 monthly and 5% of income over $2.3 million, while focusing on his daughter's well-being.
  • These events highlight ongoing legal disputes and public scrutiny, with Renner stressing the emotional toll of false accusations and his dedication to his daughter and charity work.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

14 Articles

Lean Right

After his failed marriage Jeremy Renner fights violent accusations in 2019. His ex-partner accuses him of death threats and drug abuse. Now the Marvel star breaks his silence and reckons with the sensationalism of the media.

Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 83% of the sources lean Right
83% Right
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Geo News broke the news in on Sunday, July 13, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.