The Votes Against the Amnesty Sentence: “It Means a Break of the Constitutional Pact of 78”

El Pais

Lean Left

Factuality

Ownership

The four judges of the Conservative bloc have cast dissenting votes against the sentence that upholds the amnesty law, all of whom consider it to be flatly unconstitutional. Among the strongest arguments, Judge Enrique Arnaldo considers that the ruling constitutes a breach of the 1978 constitutional pact, since the Constitution in no way permits an amnesty law.

El Debate

Factuality

Ownership

Neither the Executive nor the Legislative Power can contravene a sentence legally issued by the Judiciary. Moreover, they are so obliged ...

ondacero.es

Factuality

Ownership

The need for institutional normalization identified in the Preamble to the Amnesty Law as the purpose of the rule and which, according to the ruling passed by the Constitutional Court (TC) this Thursday by six to four votes, justifies its constitutionality, is a fallacy, in the opinion of the dissenting judges of the conservative minority.Conservatives Ricardo Enríquez, César Tolosa, Enrique Arnaldo, and Concepción Espejel sign both individual v…

Actualidad.es

Factuality

Ownership

An in-depth look at the Constitutional Court's recent ruling on amnesty in Catalonia and its possible political repercussions.Read more Breaking the sentence on amnesty in Catalonia: implications and challenges in Actualidad.es.

Libertad Digital

Factuality

Ownership

The conservative judges of the TC, Ricardo Enríquez, Enrique Arnaldo, Concepción Espejel and César Tolosa, have formulated two particular votes.