See the Complete Picture.
Published loading...Updated

Additional Opinions From Thursday, June 12

  • The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the Tax Court does not have jurisdiction to hear tax disputes once the IRS no longer has an active levy against the taxpayer’s property, as demonstrated in the case involving Jennifer Zuch.
  • This case centers on Jennifer Zuch's longstanding dispute with the IRS, which arose after the agency credited a $50,000 payment to her then-husband’s account instead of hers and later withdrew its levy when she paid off the debt.
  • Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, explained that while the Tax Court can grant injunctions related to a levy and assess the associated tax liabilities, it lacks such power when no levy has been made.
  • Justice Neil Gorsuch dissented, cautioning that the decision equips the IRS with an expanded ability to sidestep Tax Court scrutiny and limits taxpayers’ opportunities to challenge alleged errors or recover erroneous payments.
  • The ruling limits taxpayers’ options for obtaining judicial relief when the IRS makes errors and may increase the challenges involved in disputing tax liabilities after levies have been lifted or debts fully settled.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

11 Articles

All
Left
1
Center
3
Right
2
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 50% of the sources are Center
50% Center
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

World News broke the news in United States on Thursday, June 12, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics