Google must face consumer antitrust lawsuit over search dominance, US judge rules
A federal judge allowed a consumer class-action to proceed, alleging Google used deals with tech partners to block rivals and limit search engine competition.
- On Jan 22, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin refused to dismiss a consumer lawsuit filed last year accusing Google, an Alphabet unit, of using agreements with mobile manufacturers to block rivals.
- Plaintiffs contend Google paid Apple, major Android phone makers, wireless carriers and browser developers to set Google as the default search engine, limiting consumer choices and blocking alternatives.
- The judge noted U.S. District Judge Rita Lin found smaller competing search engines struggled due to Google's deals, while Google argued competing engines would not realistically pay users or enhance privacy.
7 Articles
7 Articles
US Judge Orders Google to Answer Search Monopoly Class Action Allegations
"At this stage, plaintiffs' allegations that users want compensation and competitors have continually attempted rewards schemes is sufficient to plausibly allege that search engines would compete on price in a but-for world," U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin wrote in an order allowing antitrust class-action claims to proceed against Google in California federal court.
Google Must Face Another Search Antitrust Case by Consumers (1)
Google LLC failed to escape an antitrust lawsuit from internet search users who allege the tech giant illegally monopolized the search market after a San Francisco federal court ruled they have a plausible legal theory.
Google must face consumer antitrust lawsuit over search dominance, US judge rules
Google has failed to persuade a federal judge in California to dismiss a consumer lawsuit accusing the Alphabet unit of illegally using business agreements with major tech companies to shut out rivals in the online search market.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium




