US EditionGlaser v Atay — [2025] 1 WLR 1627
Summary by iclr.co.uk
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
Glaser v Atay — [2025] 1 WLR 1627
CONSUMER PROTECTION — Contract — Unfair terms — Wife directly instructing counsel to act for her in financial remedy proceedings — Agreement between wife and counsel providing for bulk of fees to be paid before final hearing — Payment term stipulating that fees remaining payable if final hearing adjourned — Whether payment term unfair — Whether counsel nevertheless entitled to payment of proportion of fees by way of quantum meruit — Consumer Rig…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
