
News from iclr.co.uk
If you want to know if iclr.co.uk is credible or reliable, look no further. We rank iclr.co.uk as Unknown factuality. Find out more about our methodology here.
Media Bias Ratings
Do you diasgree?
Edit bias
Learn more about Media Bias Ratings.
Factuality
Learn more about Factuality Ratings
Reveal Factuality Ratings by upgrading to a Premium account.
Tap Upgrade to explore subscription options to meet all your reading needs.
Ownership
Learn more about Ownership categories
Reveal Ownership Data by upgrading to a Vantage account.
Tap Upgrade to explore subscription options to meet all your reading needs.
Top iclr.co.uk News
![AB v Slovenská sporitel’ňa as — [2025] Bus LR 1199](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgrnd.b-cdn.net%2Fadmin%2F2025%2F1%2F40d81bbcb914460aad37ce8f2841a3d3b7f8b5f8.jpg&w=1440&q=75)
European UnionEUROPEAN UNION — Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Credit agreements for consumers — Directive 2008/48/EC — Requirements relating to information to be included in such a credit agreement — Duty to provide information — Duration of the agreement — Annual percentage rate of charge APRC — Assumptions used in order to calculate the APRCRead Article
AB v Slovenská sporitel’ňa as — [2025] Bus LR 1199
![Umbrella Interchange Fee Claimants v Umbrella Interchange Fee Defendants — [2025] Bus LR 1152](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroundnews.b-cdn.net%2Finterests%2Fac6e050e96d685cf969d501a49994f89b19e543b.jpg&w=1440&q=75)
United Kingdom · United KingdomLIMITATION OF ACTION — Period of limitation — Postponement of limitation period — Claimants bringing action for infringement of competition law — Whether principle of effectiveness requiring postponement of limitation period until cessation of infringementRead Article
Umbrella Interchange Fee Claimants v Umbrella Interchange Fee Defendants — [2025] Bus LR 1152
![Home Office v Shah — [2025] WLR(D) 291](/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Fgeneric_2_half.2fb9ca2d.webp&w=1440&q=75)
Home Office · LondonINDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Employment tribunals — Procedure — Claimant employed as immigration officer until withdrawal of security clearance — Claimant making claim of sex discrimination — Claimant excluded from parts of hearing on ground of national security — Special advocates appointed to represent claimant’s interests — Tribunal ordering Home Office to provide gist of reasons for dismissal — Whether tribunal erred — Employment Tribunals (Consti…Read Article