US EditionMark Latham Denies Horror Abuse Claims Made by Former Partner
NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA, JUL 14 – Mark Latham denies multiple domestic abuse claims including emotional and financial manipulation amid an ongoing court case involving a domestic violence order application.
- Mark Latham, a 64-year-old NSW Legislative Council member and former Labor leader, denied domestic abuse allegations made by his former partner, Nathalie Matthews, 37.
- These allegations stem from an apprehended violence application filed by Matthews seeking a no-contact order after claiming sustained emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, including degrading acts and intimidation.
- Documents lodged in the NSW Local Court allege that Latham coerced Matthews into sexual activities involving others, insisted she refer to him as 'master', threw plates, drove his car towards her, and inflicted physical injuries.
- Latham publicly called the allegations “comically false” on July 14, stating on X he has “scores of documents” to defend himself and called the claims “absolute rubbish.”
- The case is set for mention at the Local Court in Downing Centre on July 30, reflecting ongoing legal issues amid Latham’s persistent denials and his contentious political history.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
21 Articles
21 Articles
Latham Responds to Abuse Allegations, Calls AVO Claims ‘Comical’
Independent NSW MP and former Labor leader Mark Latham has strongly denied allegations of domestic abuse made by his former partner, Nathalie Matthews, who has lodged a private application for an apprehended domestic violence order (AVO). The matter is scheduled for a hearing on July 30, but Latham says he has not yet been served with any official documents. Matthews, a businesswoman with logistics operations across Dubai, Sydney and Perth, is r…
·New York, United States
Read Full Article
Coverage Details
Total News Sources21
Leaning Left7Leaning Right7Center1Last UpdatedBias Distribution47% Left, 47% Right
Bias Distribution
- 47% of the sources lean Left, 47% of the sources lean Right
47% Right
L 47%
R 47%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
