Published • loading... • Updated
Researchers Discover Second Sphinx in Egypt as Scans Unearth 'Underground Megastructure'
Italian researcher Filippo Biondi claims radar data reveals a second Sphinx and underground passages beneath Giza, but experts say no archaeological evidence supports this theory.
- On Thursday, radar engineer Filippo Biondi announced satellite radar scans suggest a second Sphinx and a massive "underground megastructure" lie buried beneath the Giza Plateau, mirroring the known Sphinx's location.
- Biondi's findings rely on geometric symmetry and imagery from the ancient Dream Stele, a stone slab placed between the paws of the Great Sphinx around 1400 BC that appears to depict two sphinx figures.
- Using satellite radar to detect subtle ground vibrations, Biondi claims there is "100 percent" geometrical correlation in the symmetry; he is "about 80 percent" confident the structure exists beneath a 180-foot-high mound of hardened sand.
- Dr. Zahi Hawass, former minister of antiquities, rejected the findings as "neither scientifically approved nor validated," stating no confirmed archaeological evidence supports the existence of a second Sphinx.
- Despite drawing around 10 million views across social media, the scientific community maintains the second Sphinx remains speculation without peer-reviewed research or excavation to validate the claims.
Insights by Ground AI
17 Articles
17 Articles
Radar scans spark debate over possible second Sphinx beneath Giza plateau
Recent claims that a “massive underground structure” beneath the Giza Plateau in Egypt could indicate a second Sphinx‑like monument have reignited global archaeological discussion, though experts stress that the evidence remains unverified and controversial. The speculation centres on data interpreted from satellite radar scans conducted by an Italian researcher, Filippo Biondi, and his team. Source
·Spain
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources17
Leaning Left2Leaning Right6Center3Last UpdatedBias Distribution55% Right
Bias Distribution
- 55% of the sources lean Right
55% Right
L 18%
C 27%
R 55%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium











