Federal judge rules New Hampshire law limiting teaching of race, gender topics unconstitutional
- A federal judge declared New Hampshire's law restricting teachers on discussing race, gender, and other topics in schools unconstitutional, potentially making it an election issue.
- Republicans supported the law to prevent divisive concepts after the Trump administration's actions.
- Various groups, including ACLU, NEA-NH, AFT-NH, administrators, teachers, and parents, sued about the vague phrasing restricting speech.
24 Articles
24 Articles
Federal Judge Strikes Down School Ban on CRT, ‘Divisive Concepts’
In a first in the nation, a New Hampshire federal judge ruled on May 28 that banning teaching critical race theory (CRT) and other “divisive concepts” in schools is unconstitutional. The ruling, prompted by a legal challenge of the ban by the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA), could have a sweeping impact across the U.S., where 44 states have enacted such bans. In what the American Civil Libertie…

New Hampshire's limits on teaching on race and gender are unconstitutional, judge says
A federal judge has struck down New Hampshire’s nearly 3-year-old law limiting what teachers can say about race, gender, sexual orientation, disability and other topics. The judge says the law
Educators celebrate as judge strikes down New Hampshire 'banned concepts' law
Education and free speech advocates cheered Tuesday's federal court ruling striking down New Hampshire's classroom censorship law, one of several so-called "white discomfort" bills passed in Republican-controlled states in recent years.U.S. District Judge Paul J. Barbadoro's 50-page ruling says that the New England state's so-called "banned concepts" law is "unconstitutionally vague" and contains "viewpoint-based restrictions on speech that do n…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 48% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium