Why AI Projects Fail, According to EPA CIO
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, JUL 09 – EPA CIO Carter Farmer stresses AI must have clear use cases and quality data to avoid wasted efforts, noting only 25% of AI investments pay off, according to a CEO survey.
4 Articles
4 Articles
EPA IT chief’s warning: AI can’t be used ‘to solve any problem’
Like most of its government peers, the Environmental Protection Agency has embraced artificial intelligence and filled its federally required inventory with more than a dozen use cases. But the emerging technology shouldn’t be mistaken for a cure-all, the agency’s new IT chief warned Tuesday. Carter Farmer, who took over as the EPA’s chief information officer in May after seven-plus years in IT systems roles at the U.S. Institute of Peace, said …
Shiny object syndrome spells doom for many AI projects, warns EPA CIO
Chasing the hype without a clear use case? You may crash and burn US Environmental Protection Agency CIO Carter Farmer has a blunt message for AI hype-chasers: Shiny-object syndrome too often drives teams to leap into AI without defining a clear use case or vetting their data, leaving them to…
Over the past two years, many organizations have launched dozens of AI proof-of-concept projects, resulting in high failure rates and disappointing returns on investment. However, a trend is slowly taking hold, marked by a significant rethinking of the indiscriminate approach to AI experimentation. Some IT observers now see many organizations reducing the number of AI proofs of concept they launch. Some IT leaders are even turning to commercial …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium