Skip to main content
4th of July Sale — Get 40% off Vantage subscriptions
Published loading...Updated

Environmental groups wanted to see clear decarbonization commitment in pipeline plan

Pembina Institute and Clean Prosperity say the plan should have included a firm Pathways carbon capture pledge.

  • On Thursday, Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a new oil pipeline proposal from Alberta to the British Columbia coast, backed by Trans Mountain and Pembina Pipeline corporations.
  • The proposed pipeline spans more than 1,000 kilometres with an estimated cost of $35.2 to $43.7 billion, while the federal government agreed to fund B.C. infrastructure and maintain the North Coast tanker ban.
  • Premier David Eby stated his government will not fight the project in court, citing the province's unsuccessful Trans Mountain Expansion legal battle, though environmental groups criticized the plan for lacking a firm commitment to finalize the Pathways carbon-capture project.
  • Coastal First Nations expressed relief at the upheld tanker ban, while the Pembina Institute and Clean Prosperity urged stronger decarbonization pledges before the project accelerates toward a September 1, 2027, construction start.
  • Arguing Canada should prioritize clean-energy infrastructure, Climate Action Network Canada characterized the proposal as an "economically misguided" repeat of the Trans Mountain Expansion rather than a path toward decarbonization.
Insights by Ground AI

39 Articles

The Toronto StarThe Toronto Star
+28 Reposted by 28 other sources
Lean Left

Environmental groups wanted to see clear decarbonization commitment in pipeline plan

OTTAWA - Environment groups say they wanted to see a more concrete commitment to decarbonization in the proposal put forward for a pipeline to the B.C. coast backed by the

·Toronto, Canada
Read Full Article
Penticton Western NewsPenticton Western News
+8 Reposted by 8 other sources
Lean Left

Mixed emotions from B.C. environmental groups on Alberta’s pipeline proposal

Alberta’s plans for a new oil pipeline to B.C.’s coast that runs close to or alongside the current Trans Mountain were met with mixed reviews from environmental groups. On the one hand, it does not require chopping down a giant swath of forest and lifting the moratorium on oil tankers docking on B.C.’s North Coast, as a northern route would. But it’s still an oil pipeline that would be more than 1,000 kilometres long. “The decision to uphold the…

Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe
4th of July SaleGet 40% off Vantage subscriptions for yourself or a friend.Get Started

Bias Distribution

  • 79% of the sources lean Left
79% Left

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Winnipeg Free Press broke the news in Winnipeg, Canada on Friday, July 3, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal