Does artificial intelligence deserve a seat in Canada's courtrooms?
- Fraser MacLean discovered that opposing counsel Chong Ke used artificial intelligence, resulting in fake case citations in court.
- Ke's misuse of AI led to a reprimand from the judge and an investigation by the Law Society of B.C.
- The Canadian Bar Association has issued guidelines warning about AI in legal contexts, encouraging cautious use by lawyers.
- Experts caution that, while AI can improve efficiency, it poses risks such as producing fake evidence and compromising judicial integrity.
38 Articles
38 Articles
‘All the hallmarks of ChatGPT’ — judge suspects man used AI in legal case against planned driving range near his home
A man has been accused by a High Court judge of using artificial intelligence (AI) to prepare an unsuccessful legal challenge against the development of a driving range roof near his home in Co Tipperary.
Does artificial intelligence deserve a seat in Canada's courtrooms?
Courts and law societies across Canada have issued directives on the use of AI by lawyers and court staff. But the rules and guidelines are inconsistent and some doubt whether they are being universally followed.

Does artificial intelligence deserve a seat in Canada’s courtrooms?
VANCOUVER - The case law looked real to Fraser MacLean.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage