Disability-rights arguments grow heated at Supreme Court, though sweeping ruling appears unlikely
- A disability-rights case from Minnesota grew unusually heated at the Supreme Court on Monday.
- A teenage girl's family appealed after lower courts blocked their discrimination lawsuit against her school.
- The family argues the school failed to accommodate her needs and lower courts set too high a bar for lawsuits.
- Arguments included accusations of lying, with one lawyer stating, "We never said you should have a double regime."
- Justices appeared skeptical of some arguments, and a decision is expected by the end of June 2025.
112 Articles
112 Articles
Argument about adequate education for a disabled child gets heated - SCOTUSblog
Argument about adequate education for a disabled child gets heated SCOTUSblog Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source The post Argument about adequate education for a disabled child gets heated – SCOTUSblog appeared first on RocketNews.
Disability Rights Debate Intensifies at Supreme Court, But Major Ruling Unlikely - Miamistandard News
Washington, D.C – On Monday, the Supreme Court’s disability rights case got a lot more heated than usual. People were accused of lying, and one side’s position was called a possible “five-alarm fire.” A teenage girl with a rare form of epilepsy filed the appeal. Her family says that some courts have made it too hard to sue public schools that don’t make sure students learn what they need to. Lower courts had stopped her family’s discrimination c…
Disability-rights arguments grow heated at Supreme Court
The appeal comes from a teenage girl with a rare form of epilepsy whose family says some courts have made it too hard to sue public schools that fail to make sure students get what they need to learn.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 74% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage