US EditionCT Lawyer Ed Nusbaum Wants Court to Punish Client Who Fired Him — and Let Him Keep $64,000
Summary by frankreport.com
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.2 Articles
2 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
frankreport.comReposted by 
Artvoice
ArtvoiceCT Lawyer Ed Nusbaum Wants Court to Punish Client Who Fired Him — and Let Him Keep $64,000
Arbitration The case is Nusbaum v Riordan. The arbitration order came on November 4, 2024. Both parties share the arbitration fee. If one party paid more, they could ask for it back later. A regular lawsuit by a judge and a jury would cost the parties zero. That’s what taxes are meant to pay for – a system of justice. But attorney Ed Nusbaum demanded arbitration. He always prefers this to open court. In fact he won’t represent a client unless th…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources2
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
