US EditionPublished • loading... • Updated
Criminal — Interpreter – Effectiveness of counsel
Summary by Michigan Lawyers Weekly
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
Criminal — Interpreter – Effectiveness of counsel
Where a jury found a defendant guilty of second-degree criminal sexual conduct (victim under 13 years old) and accosting a child for an immoral purpose, those convictions should be affirmed despite the defendant’s argument that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to provide him with an interpreter. The post Criminal — Interpreter – Effectiveness of counsel first appeared on Michigan Lawyers Weekly.
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
