Court denies intervenors in Scotts Valley Gaming Case
2 Articles
2 Articles
Court denies intervenors in Scotts Valley Gaming Case
Less than a month ago the Department of the Interior formally let interested parties know that it was reconsidering its original approval for the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians’ casino project in Vallejo. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has other plans. In a decisive ruling on Wednesday, judge Trevor N. McFadden denied efforts by three outside tribes to intervene in the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians’ lawsuit challen…
D.C. Federal Court Denies Intervention in Scotts Valley Gaming Case
Here are the intervention materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.): 12 First Amended Complaint 15 UAC Motion to Intervene 16-1 Wintun Tribes Motion to Intervene 20-1 GTL Motion to Intervene 29 Federal Opposition to Tribal Motions 30 Federal Opposition to 20 31 Scotts Valley Combined Opposition 34 GTL Reply 35 UAC Reply 36 Wintun Tribes Reply 38 DCT Order on Intervention Prior post here.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage