US EditionCase Review: Intisari Mulia Engineering Sdn Bhd V TUV SUD (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [2024] MLJU 3053. - Conventus Law
Summary by Conventus Law
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
Case Review: Intisari Mulia Engineering Sdn Bhd V TUV SUD (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [2024] MLJU 3053. - Conventus Law
Background In Intisari Mulia Engineering Sdn Bhd v TUV SUD (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [2024] MLJU 3053, the Court of Appeal interpreted the meaning of “ construction contract made in writing relating to construction work ” pursuant to section 2 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“ CIPAA 2012 ”). Aker Solutions Malaysia Sdn Bhd (“ Main Contractor 1 ”) appointed TUV SUD (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (“ TUV ”) for the “supply of manpowe…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
