Published • loading... • Updated
Cost of living drives 3 in 4 Canadians to skip eating out, report shows
Canadians prioritize quick-service restaurants and snacks amid rising costs, with 81% of 18-34 year-olds favoring this trend, according to Restaurants Canada's 2025 report.
- According to a Restaurants Canada report released on September 22, 2025, 75 percent of Canadians have reduced their frequency of dining out, largely due to increasing living expenses.
- This decrease in dining out results from double-digit increases in food, labour, and insurance costs squeezing restaurant margins and affordability pressures on consumers.
- The report highlights that 41 percent of restaurants operated at a loss or broke even as of June 2025, while Canadians shifted spending toward quick-service and breakfast menus for better value.
- Solo dining reservations increased 28 percent compared to last year, and 65 percent of Canadians replace a full meal with a snack monthly, signaling changing consumer habits.
- These trends suggest continued challenges for foodservice businesses in 2025, requiring adaptations to cost pressures and evolving customer preferences.
Insights by Ground AI
14 Articles
14 Articles
Three out of four Canadians eat less at the restaurant, often because of the high cost of living, according to one report.
·Montreal, Canada
Read Full ArticleRestaurants Struggle as More Canadians Look for Value, Dine out Less: Report
Restaurants are under pressure as consumers steer away from dining out, while rising operational costs squeeze profit margins, a new report shows. Three in four Canadians are eating out less, often because of the high cost of living, a Restaurants Canada report published Monday found. That share is even higher among those aged 18 to 34 at 81 percent. Restaurants Canada chief executive Kelly Higginson said it’s an “alarming” trend for the foodser…
·New York, United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources14
Leaning Left7Leaning Right1Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution59% Left
Bias Distribution
- 59% of the sources lean Left
59% Left
L 59%
C 33%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium