Don't Just Read the News, Understand It.
Published loading...Updated

IMK Consultations on AfD: Consequences for Officials and Arms Owners? - SAT.1 REGIONAL

Summary by SAT.1 REGIONAL
Bremerhaven (dpa) – The classification of the AfD as a secure right-wing extremist by constitutional protection has sparked discussions among the interior ministers on how to deal with the party and its members in the state service. He believes it would be useful to set up a federal-state working group dealing with the new report on the AfD prepared by the Federal Office for Constitutional Protection, said the chairman of the Interior Minister's…
DisclaimerThis story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.

2 Articles

All
Left
Center
Right

Bremerhaven (dpa) – The classification of the AfD as a secure right-wing extremist by constitutional protection has sparked discussions among the interior ministers on how to deal with the party and its members in the state service. He believes it would be useful to set up a federal-state working group dealing with the new report on the AfD prepared by the Federal Office for Constitutional Protection, said the chairman of the Interior Minister's…

Internal security, migration, ban on customs duties - and the handling of the AfD: At the meeting of the Minister of the Interior in Bremerhaven, the issue of AfD is likely to become controversial.

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

zdfheute.de broke the news in on Wednesday, June 11, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.