See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Boeing whistleblowers describe 'criminal cover-up,' safety risks to Senate

  • Boeing engineer-turned-whistleblower, Sam Salehpour, raised safety concerns at a US Senate hearing, warning of potential risks if quality issues are not addressed.
  • Boeing has refuted the whistleblower's claims of cutting corners, defending the aircraft and its testing procedures.
  • Recent safety incidents, like the Boeing 737 Max 9 door panel blowout, have raised questions about Boeing's safety culture, leading to a crisis and Senate hearings.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

93 Articles

All
Left
21
Center
42
Right
9
Hawaii Tribune-HeraldHawaii Tribune-Herald
+8 Reposted by 8 other sources
Center

Boeing put under Senate scrutiny during back-to-back hearings on aircraft maker’s safety culture - Hawaii Tribune-Herald

An engineer at Boeing said Wednesday that the aircraft company, in rushing to produce as many planes as possible, is taking manufacturing shortcuts that could lead to jetliners breaking apart.

Lean Left

Before a US Senate committee of inquiry, four former employees of the aircraft manufacturer on Wednesday highlighted malfunctions in aircraft production and risks to the safety of travelers.

·Paris, France
Read Full Article
Center

A Boeing engineer testified before the US Senate about significant safety defects. Senators demanded that the US aircraft manufacturer improve its safety concept. Claudia Sarre.[more].

·Hamburg, Germany
Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 58% of the sources are Center
58% Center
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Wral News broke the news in Raleigh, United States on Tuesday, April 16, 2024.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.