US EditionBirthright citizenship debate erupts as Supreme Court arguments near
- The Supreme Court heard arguments on May 15, 2025, addressing the Trump administration's request related to birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions.
- The case arises after Trump issued an executive order denying citizenship to children born in the U.S. If their parents are not citizens or lawful residents, which federal judges blocked nationwide.
- The Court will consider if federal judges can issue nationwide injunctions, a procedural issue impacting the order's enforcement and potentially affecting children born to immigrant mothers differently within the same hospital.
- The Justice Department reported judges have issued 39 nationwide injunctions, calling the situation "an epidemic," while legal experts say Trump's plan conflicts with the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship at birth.
- If the court sides with the administration, children born in states like Kentucky to parents in the country illegally could lose citizenship, creating uncertainty for immigrants such as Barbara, a Cuban refugee expecting a child.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
211 Articles
211 Articles
All
Left
59
Center
82
Right
18
Koco News5+2 Reposted by 2 other sources
Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship
The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Trump’s bid to end birthright citizenship, a case that could reshape federal court authority and immigration laws.
·Oklahoma City, United States
Read Full Article
Associated Press News+37 Reposted by 37 other sources
What to know about the Supreme Court arguments in the birthright citizenship case
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in its first case stemming from the flurry of actions marking the start of President Donald Trump’s second term.
·United States
Read Full Article
Why this Supreme Court hearing is — and isn’t — about birthright citizenship
The government’s main complaint in this appeal, which combines all three cases, isn’t that Trump’s executive order is legal but that judges in three states overstepped in granting nationwide relief.
·United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources211
Leaning Left59Leaning Right18Center82Last UpdatedBias Distribution52% Center
Bias Distribution
- 52% of the sources are Center
52% Center
L 37%
C 52%
11%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
