US EditionBarrett, Jackson spar in birthright citizenship case opinions
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, JUN 28 – The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to restrict district courts' power to issue nationwide injunctions, a move favoring the Trump administration and featuring a rare rebuke of Justice Jackson by Justice Barrett.
- In a 6–3 decision, the United States Supreme Court limited district courts from issuing nationwide injunctions, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett authoring the majority opinion.
- The case arose from an emergency appeal by the Trump administration, prompted by three federal district courts blocking the January 20, 2025, birthright citizenship order, leading to Supreme Court review.
- Using pointed language, Barrett wrote, `We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself.`
- The administration hailed the decision as a major boost for Trump after recent legal setbacks, with Trump praising Barrett as writing the opinion 'brilliantly' at a White House press conference.
- Despite the restriction, judges may continue to block the order through new legal strategies, indicating future pathways for broad relief such as class actions or statewide lawsuits.
57 Articles
57 Articles
The most intense dissents of the term
During the 2024-25 term, the court was unanimous 42% of the time in its Opinions of the Court. In the remaining 58% of such cases, the justices’ dissents were typically restrained and mundane. In a small number of cases, however, the dissents were somewhat more … critical. Now that the term is over, I thought it would be valuable, both from a historical and, well, human, perspective, to highlight some of the more eye-opening dissents of the te…
Justice Barrett Exposes Justice Jackson's Stupid Dissent
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett launched a takedown of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s “extreme” dissent in the landmark birthright citizenship case. It mostly eliminates nationwide injunctions, the NY Post reports. Brown Jackson’s writing is very poor and inappropriately informal. She used expressions like “full stop” in the formal document, as well as phrases like, […] The post Justice Barrett Exposes Justice Jackson’s Stupid Dissent a…
sgtreport.com
PJ MediaAmy Coney Barrett Utterly Humiliated Ketanji Brown Jackson
by Matt Margolis, PJ Media: Justice Amy Coney Barrett has gotten a bad rap lately for siding with the leftist wing of the Supreme Court on a few cases, but if you ever needed a reminder of why ACB was such a pivotal addition to the Supreme Court, look no further than her latest majority […]
Justice Barrett Torches Justice Jackson In Case’s Majority Ruling ⋆ Conservative Firing Line
The following article, Justice Barrett Torches Justice Jackson In Case’s Majority Ruling, was first published on Conservative Firing Line. Genteel. Restrained. Those descriptives often are applicable in Supreme Court opinions when factions, a majority and a dissent, disagree. It sometimes moves toward the critical, such as when Chief Justice John Roberts and others, disagreeing with the leftist majority at that time that fabricated out of nothin…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 57% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
