US Copyright Office Rules AI-Generated Content Requires Human Creativity for Protection
- Artists can copyright works they made with the help of Artificial Intelligence, according to a new report by the U.S. Copyright Office.
- The report emphasizes the 'centrality of human creativity' in authoring works that deserve copyright protections.
- An AI-assisted work is copyrightable if it includes a human's 'creative arrangements or modifications.'
- Shira Perlmutter stated, 'Extending protection to material whose expressive elements are determined by a machine would undermine rather than further the constitutional goals of copyright.
71 Articles
71 Articles
Officials Rule That AI Art Needs “Human Expression” for Copyrights
The U.S. Copyright Office has just ruled that AI art created with text prompts, or “purely AI-generated material,” cannot be copyrighted. The decision, detailed in a report published on January 29, offers some clarity in the murky legal territory surrounding AI within creative industries, emphasizing the dangers of “using AI as a stand-in for human creativity.” The report stems from an ongoing investigation into AI-generated works which began in…
US Copyright Office: generative AI art requires ‘human authorship’ for protection
The United States Copyright Office, a federal organization and a taxpayer-funded public good founded in 1897, has issued formal guidance on the issue of AI-generated content. A document posted in January states that works lacking “human authorship” will not be protected by U.S. copyright. However, “the requisite level of creativity” required to fulfill that criteria “is extremely low.” The document was also reported on by GamesIndustry.biz. More…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 53% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium