US Copyright Office Rules AI-Generated Content Requires Human Creativity for Protection
- The U.S. Copyright Office issued guidance stating that AI-generated content requires human creativity for copyright protection.
- The guidelines indicate that AI prompts do not provide enough control to allow users to be considered authors of the output.
- The office clarified that using AI to assist in creative work does not affect its copyrightability.
- The Copyright Office is preparing another report on issues related to AI training on copyrighted works and liability.
71 Articles
71 Articles
Officials Rule That AI Art Needs “Human Expression” for Copyrights
The U.S. Copyright Office has just ruled that AI art created with text prompts, or “purely AI-generated material,” cannot be copyrighted. The decision, detailed in a report published on January 29, offers some clarity in the murky legal territory surrounding AI within creative industries, emphasizing the dangers of “using AI as a stand-in for human creativity.” The report stems from an ongoing investigation into AI-generated works which began in…
US Copyright Office: generative AI art requires ‘human authorship’ for protection
The United States Copyright Office, a federal organization and a taxpayer-funded public good founded in 1897, has issued formal guidance on the issue of AI-generated content. A document posted in January states that works lacking “human authorship” will not be protected by U.S. copyright. However, “the requisite level of creativity” required to fulfill that criteria “is extremely low.” The document was also reported on by GamesIndustry.biz. More…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 53% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage