2027: Atiku’s Supporters Protest In Abuja Over Court Judgment Voiding Candidacy
- The Independent National Electoral Commission stated on Friday it will follow any final court ruling on former Vice President Atiku Abubakar's eligibility for the January 16, 2027 presidential election.
- A Federal High Court judgment delivered November 5, 2026 nullified David Mark's leadership of the African Democratic Congress , the party under which Atiku emerged as presidential candidate, creating uncertainty around his participation.
- Professor Joash Amupitan, INEC Chairman, stated he is "obligated under Section 285 of the Constitution of Nigeria to obey every court order," emphasizing the commission must enforce judicial pronouncements regardless of political fallout.
- Amupitan lamented the commission faces more than 300 pending court cases just 66 days before the election, warning that late judicial reversals create major operational headaches for logistical preparations.
- Bukola Idowa, director of the Kimpact Development Initiative, warned that any perception of an opaque electoral process could undermine the vote's validity in Africa's top crude oil producer.
32 Articles
32 Articles
INEC will obey court verdict on Atiku’s eligibility –...
The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Joash Amupitan, has declared that the electoral body is constitutionally bound to abide by whatever final judgement the courts deliver regarding the eligibility of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar to contest the 2027 presidential election. Speaking at Chatham House in London on Thursday, Amupitan responded to questions on whether Atiku would remain on the ballot if h…
2027: INEC will obey court decision on Atiku’s eligibility – Amupitan
The INEC chairman said he was constitutionally obligated to obey court orders, particularly decisions of the Supreme Court, regardless of the political implications.
Nigeria: ADC Supporters Protest At Abuja Court Over Judgement Sacking Party's 2027 Candidates
"We disagree with the judgement. We have a constitutional right to appeal it. But we cannot appeal what we do not have," the proters alleged in their petition.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 56% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
















