Videos in hockey players’ trial highlight misconceptions about consent: law experts
LONDON, ONTARIO, CANADA, JUL 22 – Videos shown in court highlight widespread legal confusion over consent, with experts emphasizing that consent must be ongoing and affirmative, not implied from past statements or behavior.
- Five ex-players from Canada's world junior hockey teams have been charged with sexual assault following an incident that took place in a hotel room in London, Ontario, on June 19, 2018.
- The case arose after a Hockey Canada gala and involved a lengthy police investigation and extensive legal scrutiny focusing on voluntary consent.
- Two cellphone videos showed the complainant saying the encounter was "all consensual," but prosecutors and experts argued these videos did not prove ongoing, affirmative consent.
- Daphne Gilbert, a legal expert specializing in sexual violence and abuse, explained that consent must be enthusiastic, continuous, and current throughout the sexual activity, while prosecutor Meaghan Cunningham highlighted that consent needs to be clearly expressed for each individual act.
- The trial underscores challenges in understanding consent, with experts warning that acquittals or the trial's public nature could discourage reporting and prompt legislative reforms.
80 Articles
80 Articles

Judge to rule in sexual assault case that shook Canadian hockey
A Canadian judge will deliver a verdict Thursday in the trial of five professional ice hockey players on sexual assault charges, in a case that has rocked the cherished national sport.
Experts believe that these videos show a lack of knowledge of Canadian sexual assault law.
Videos in hockey players’ trial highlight misconceptions about consent: law experts
As five former Canadian world junior hockey players await a ruling in their sexual assault trial, legal experts say videos shown in court of the complainant saying she was OK with what had happened highlight a broader misunderstanding of consent and sexual assault law in Canada.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 49% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium