US judge tosses Illinois’ ban on semiautomatic weapons, governor pledges swift appeal
- A federal judge has overturned Illinois’ ban on semiautomatic weapons, citing recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings on the Second Amendment.
- U.S. District Judge Stephen P. McGlynn stated that his decision applied universally, beyond the lawsuit’s plaintiffs.
- Governor Pritzker promised a swift appeal against the ruling.
130 Articles
130 Articles
Federal US judge strikes down Illinois assault weapons ban over Second Amendment violations
A federal US judge struck down Illinois’ Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA) on Friday, ruling it unconstitutional under the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. US District Judge Stephen McGlynn ruled that PICA infringes on an individual’s Second Amendment rights, citing recent US Supreme Court interpretations of the Second Amendment. He stated: “The Government may not deprive law-abiding citizens of their guaranteed right to self-defen…
Law Banning Semi-Automatic Firearms Is Unconstitutional, Trump-Appointed Judge Rules
A federal judge overturned an Illinois law banning many semi-automatic firearms, ruling it violated the right to bear arms. According toReuters, U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn of the Southern District of Illinois ruled the ban was not “consistent with the nation’s history and tradition of firearm regulations.” “FPC WIN: Today, Federal District Court Judge Stephen...


Illinois’ semiautomatic weapons ban tossed in federal court as governor vows swift appeal
A federal judge on Friday overturned Illinois’ ban on semiautomatic weapons, leaning on recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings that strictly interpret the Second Amendment right to keep and bear firearms.
Federal judge says Illinois assault rifle ban is unconstitutional
(The Hill) — A federal judge in Illinois ruled that the state's assault rifle ban is unconstitutional, arguing that the decision violates the Second Amendment. In U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn's opinion, he issued a permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of the ban, though he stated the injunction won't take effect for 30 days, meaning it's paused to give time for an appeal. The decision comes as a federal appeals court in the state …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 61% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage