See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Trump gains Native American support amid economic concerns

NAVAJO NATION, UNITED STATES, JUL 21 – Trump's 'America First' policies have boosted his support among Native Americans despite proposed $24.5 billion federal funding cuts that threaten essential tribal services, Brookings Institution analysis shows.

  • In November 2025, Native American voter Ms. Nita Mexican from Tuba City cast her ballot for Donald Trump amid rising economic and social concerns on the reservation.
  • This shift follows Trump’s 'America First' policies that cut federal aid programs, altered immigration enforcement, and sparked mixed reactions in Native communities.
  • Supporters value job prospects and strong deportation policies, while critics cite environmental damage, food stamp cuts, and stops of Navajos by immigration agents based on skin color.
  • Trump won Navajo County by 17.1 points in 2025, doubling his margin from four years prior, though Native voters overall favored Democrats with less enthusiasm than before.
  • The election results suggest growing Native American political complexity shaped by economic hardships and cultural concerns amid broader U.S. policy shifts and reduced federal support.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

72 Articles

Lean Left

ANALYSIS. The brutality with which the United States has dismantled its development agency is causing shock in African countries, victims of the US President's transactional policy.

·Paris, France
Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 45% of the sources are Center
45% Center

Factuality 

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

KULR-TV broke the news in Billings, United States on Sunday, July 20, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.