Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

The Intelligible Asylum Seeker: Creating an Affectively Credible Protagonist

Asylum judges derive the legitimacy of their decisions through an evaluation of the asylumseeker’s credibility, which is thought to filter out fraudulent asylum claims. Scholars haveanalyzed credibility as consistency, reflecting how judges themselves define credibility intheir written decisions. I challenge the notion of credibility as being solely based in consistency by exploring its affective construction in asylum cases.
DisclaimerThis story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.Cross Cancel Icon

Bias Distribution

  • There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

graduateinstitute.ch broke the news in on Thursday, January 15, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)
News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal