US EditionThe Cta Explains Almost All the Controversy of the Weekend: It Forgets Lamine and Mbappé
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.2 Articles
2 Articles
The Technical Committee of Arbitrators (CTA) considered that the VAR had to intervene in order for the referee of the Celta-Rayo Vallecano party (3-0) to review the maximum penalty that he pointed to 'Pacha' Espino over Bryan Zaragoza, because it was a "penalty without sufficient basis", and to change his decision "overturning the maximum penalty".In the weekly "Rrevision Time" of the plays of the last day, the CTA understands that although the …
The Technical Committee of Arbitrators (CTA) considered that the VAR had to intervene in order for the referee of the Celta-Rayo Vallecano party (3-0) to review the maximum penalty that he pointed to 'Pacha' Espino over Bryan Zaragoza, because it was a "penalty without sufficient basis", and to change his decision "overturning the maximum penalty".In the weekly "Rrevision Time" of the plays of the last day, the CTA understands that although the …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
