US EditionWomen's Wimbledon Final Reignites Pointless Debate Over Equal Prize Money
3 Articles
3 Articles
Equality of rights means, among other things, equal prize money, even if today there will be no shortage of themes to those who do not agree
Women's Wimbledon Final Reignites Pointless Debate Over Equal Prize Money
The Wimbledon women’s singles final between Iga Swiatek and Amanda Anisimova was something of a disappointment for anyone who wasn’t a diehard fan of the Pole. That is a fact. It was so one-sided it couldn’t be anything other than a disappointment, especially for thos who had paid a princely sum for a Centre Court ticket. But this can happen — particularly when arguably the best female tennis player since Serena Williams is delivering an almost …
After the 60 60 of Swiatek in 57 minutes new criticism of the equality of prizes between men and women. The 3 out of 5 would solve? The most one-way ending in the history of Wimbledon Wimbledon . Alcaraz and Sinner are from another planet. It's not true that Alcaraz has more talent. He can do different things. But Sinner Wimbledon also towards a probable final Sinner-Alcaraz: hypothesis pros and cons.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
