Supreme Court seems to back letting parents opt kids out of LGBTQ stories
- The case Mahmoud v. Taylor involves parents in Montgomery County, Md., and the local school district regarding LGBTQ+ stories in schools.
- Justice Samuel Alito questioned the feasibility of allowing parents to opt their children out of LGBTQ+ stories.
- Justice Clarence Thomas expressed concern about whether children are voluntarily exposed to LGBTQ+ content.
- The Supreme Court seems to support an opt-out option for LGBTQ+ readings in schools.
227 Articles
227 Articles
Read Freely Alabama cites Colorado case in library lawsuit
Not much has happened in Read Freely Alabama’s lawsuit against the Autauga-Prattville Public Library since the plaintiffs asked for a preliminary injunction in October. But the plaintiffs added a new filing last week, arguing that a decision in a similar 10th Circuit Court case in Colorado supports their request for a preliminary injunction against the library. In Crookshanks et al. v. Elizabeth School District, a federal judge granted a prelimi…
Why Mahmoud v Taylor is Allowing Religious Liberties Back in Schools | CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA
From kindergarten through 12th grade, I attended public school right outside Washington, D.C. Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) is considered to be one of the best school districts in Virginia with reading levels above the national standard, top teachers from the best universities, and countless opportunities for their students.. However, with the benefits also came the disadvantages.My primary years (from kindergarten through eighth grade) we
Dispute Over 'LGBTQ-Inclusive' Childrens' Storybooks Highlights Importance of School Choice
Even secular parents should find the idea of strangers teaching their prepubescent children about sexuality and gender dysphoria at such a young age and in such a frivolous manner unacceptable.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 36% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium