US EditionSupreme Court agrees to hear appeal from New Jersey faith-based pregnancy center
- On Monday, June 16, 2025, the Supreme Court announced it would hear First Choice Women’s Resource Centers’ appeal concerning a 2023 subpoena issued by New Jersey, which is part of the state’s investigation into allegations that the center provided misleading information about abortion services.
- This case originated when the chief legal officer of New Jersey issued a subpoena requesting information on donors, advertisements, and medical staff as part of an inquiry into allegations that the center falsely represented itself as providing abortion-related services.
- First Choice, a faith-based pro-life group with five New Jersey locations, argued the subpoena chills its First Amendment rights to free speech and association and challenged the subpoena first in federal court before appealing to the Supreme Court.
- First Choice characterized the subpoena as overly intrusive, while Attorney General Platkin emphasized that nonprofits, such as crisis pregnancy centers, must not engage in deceptive or fraudulent practices against state residents and affirmed the state's right to investigate. Meanwhile, the state maintained that the lower court's ruling was appropriate and that the case did not warrant Supreme Court intervention at this time.
- This term, the Supreme Court will determine whether the center can immediately challenge the state attorney general’s subpoena in federal court or must first pursue remedies through the state court system, a decision that will clarify the extent of state oversight over crisis pregnancy centers.
169 Articles
169 Articles
Supreme Court takes up New Jersey pregnancy clinic’s discrimination case
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a case brought by a New Jersey faith-based pregnancy center challenging what it called a politically motivated investigation by the state’s Democratic attorney
Pro-life advocate appeals ruling dismissing his case against San Diego abortion facilities’ ‘buffer zones’
A pro-life advocate who has been sidewalk counseling outside abortion facilities in San Diego for 15 years is fighting for the right to practice free speech… The post Pro-life advocate appeals ruling dismissing his case against San Diego abortion facilities’ ‘buffer zones’ appeared first on CatholicVote org.
InsideNoVA.com
Pro-life activist fights city of San Diego in 9th Circuit court
(The Center Square) — A pro-life activist is challenging the city of San Diego’s standard on free speech by appealing a federal judge’s dismissal of his lawsuit against a “no speech zone” law outside abortion clinics.
The Supreme Court just made one decision that has Democrats scrambling to damage control - Political Animal News
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a major case involving New Jersey’s attack on Christian pregnancy centers, a decision that could redefine religious freedom and free speech protections nationwide. A New Jersey legal battle just took an unexpected turn. The outcome could change everything for faith-based organizations across America. And the Supreme Court just […]
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case of Pregnancy Center Targeted By New Jersey AG - Black Community News
New Jersey’s pro-abortion attorney general, Matthew Platkin, does not want pro-life pregnancy centers administering a life-saving hormone to pregnant women who’ve taken life-ending drugs to kill their unborn babies. First Choice is one of those pregnancy centers. This organization’s mission is to save unborn babies. First Choice provides free ultrasounds and testing for sexually-transmitted diseases, …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 49% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
