US EditionSupreme Court agrees to hear appeal from New Jersey faith-based pregnancy center
NEW JERSEY, UNITED STATES, JUN 16 – The Supreme Court will examine whether a New Jersey subpoena demanding donor names and internal records infringes on First Amendment protections and federal court jurisdiction.
- On June 16, the U.S. Supreme Court granted review in First Choice Women’s Resource v. Platkin, signaling a key moment in the fight over donor privacy and First Amendment rights.
- In 2023, New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin issued a broad subpoena demanding donor lists and internal records from First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, prompting legal challenges.
- Platkin’s 2023 subpoena seeks nearly 5,000 donor names and a decade of confidential documents, with ADF asserting this violates First Amendment rights to free speech and association.
- Scheduled for the 2025–2026 term, the Supreme Court’s decision could significantly impact religious liberty protections nationwide for faith-based charities.
- The Supreme Court's review could set a precedent on federal access for civil rights claims against state investigative overreach, with arguments scheduled for the 2025-2026 term.
171 Articles
171 Articles
SD Supreme Court will consider legality of Igloo bunker leases
Supreme Court takes up New Jersey pregnancy clinic’s discrimination case
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a case brought by a New Jersey faith-based pregnancy center challenging what it called a politically motivated investigation by the state’s Democratic attorney
Pro-life advocate appeals ruling dismissing his case against San Diego abortion facilities’ ‘buffer zones’
A pro-life advocate who has been sidewalk counseling outside abortion facilities in San Diego for 15 years is fighting for the right to practice free speech… The post Pro-life advocate appeals ruling dismissing his case against San Diego abortion facilities’ ‘buffer zones’ appeared first on CatholicVote org.
InsideNoVA.com
Pro-life activist fights city of San Diego in 9th Circuit court
(The Center Square) — A pro-life activist is challenging the city of San Diego’s standard on free speech by appealing a federal judge’s dismissal of his lawsuit against a “no speech zone” law outside abortion clinics.
The Supreme Court just made one decision that has Democrats scrambling to damage control - Political Animal News
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a major case involving New Jersey’s attack on Christian pregnancy centers, a decision that could redefine religious freedom and free speech protections nationwide. A New Jersey legal battle just took an unexpected turn. The outcome could change everything for faith-based organizations across America. And the Supreme Court just […]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
