Starmer Faces Pressure Over China Spy Case Collapse
The Labour Government allegedly withdrew a key witness, causing the collapse of a rare Official Secrets Act case involving espionage targeting MPs and a senior Chinese official.
- Keir Starmer's government is facing scrutiny for allegedly influencing the prosecution of a case involving espionage for China, leading to its collapse, as reported by senior UK officials and the Financial Times.
- Two men, Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry, were accused of spying for China, but the case fell apart when security officials declined to label China as an 'enemy.'
- Former Conservative MP Alicia Kearns stated that withdrawing a witness from the case raised 'serious questions about constitutional impropriety.'
- The incident highlights tensions between national security and diplomatic relations with China, with critics questioning whether Labour is compromising public safety for political reasons.
33 Articles
33 Articles
Labour 'undermined Chinese spy probe to protect relationship with Beijing'
Labour has undermined an investigation into a Chinese spy probe against politicians to protect the UK's relationship with Beijing.According to senior UK officials, Sir Keir Starmer's international security advisers and the Foreign Office had a significant dispute with the Home Office over the so-called China spying case.It is understood that the Home Office wanted to press ahead with the case but Sir Keir's Government intervened leading to prose…
Starmer Faces Questions Over Suppressed China Spy Case, Echoing Trudeau’s Beijing Scandals
Sam Cooper Alleged political meddling in a collapsed espionage case targeting Starmer’s China-critical opponents sparks crisis of confidence in Whitehall’s independence. Keir Starmer’s government is undergoing a credibility crisis over national security, with the Prime Minister himself facing mounting questions about whether he wielded political influence to have Whitehall’s independent prosecution service abruptly drop a rare Official Secrets A…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 42% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium