Review Petition Filed on Minimum 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Service in SC

Review petition filed on minimum 3-year practice rule for judicial service in SC

Plea urges court to implement rule only from 2027 to avoid exclusion of recent graduates.

Review Petition Filed in SC Against Verdict on 3-year Practice Rule for Judicial Service

Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. A review petition has been filed before the Supreme Court against its recent judgment mandating three years of practice as a lawyer for the entry posts in judicial service (post of Civil Judge-Junior Division). India News | Review Petition Filed in SC Against Verdict on 3-year Practice Rule for Judicial Service.

Review petition filed in SC against verdict on 3-year practice rule for judicial service

In the three-year mandatory practice debate, clinical legal education offers a third way

On June 16, a review petition against the SC’s three-year practice judgement raised the concern of marginalised communities’ access to the judiciary. But the SC’s reasoning that there is no effective justice without practical exposure holds weight too, and a new model of legal education may show light.

SC verdict on judicial entry challenged: Review petition filed over 3-year practice mandate

New Delhi, June 16: A review petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging its recent verdict requiring a minimum of three years of legal practice for candidates aspiring to join the judicial service as Civil Judge (Junior Division).The original judgment, delivered on May 20 by a bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, Justice Augustine George Masih, and Justice K Vinod Chandran, upheld the three-year practice rule for judic…